 |
POWER FROM TIDAL AND OPEN OCEAN CURRENTS IN THE U.S. USING GORLOV HELICAL TURBINES (GHTs)
Memo By Dr. A. M. Gorlov
Although the urgent need to develop alternatives to fossil fuel energy sources has finally received wide publicity, oil still remains the principal component of world energy production, making most western countries dependent on the import of crude oil. However, the world reserves of oil are limited and unavoidably dwindling, endangering our future energy supply. Burning fossil fuels not only leads to accumulation of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere but also destroys world reserves of hydrocarbons that are of considerable importance as raw material for the modern industry. All of these circumstances force our civilization to look for renewable energy alternatives that can at least partially replace fossil fuels in our every day power use.
A number of renewable energy alternatives can be considered: hydroelectric, wind, solar, geothermal, and biomass are the primary candidates. Yet only hydroelectric power is a substantial renewable energy source that has been used for decades at industrial scale, contributing about 10% to the total U.S. electricity production. Although production of electricity from hydropower sources continues to grow slowly in absolute terms, hydropowers share in terms of total electricity production is falling. The reason for this decline is that the conventional hydropower plant requires a dam as a principal component of the power system. However, there are not too many sites left in the U.S. where building such dams can be justified. Furthermore, the damming of rivers damages the environment by flooding animal habitats and agricultural lands, as well as interfering with fish migration.
The GHT Turbine (GHT), which can efficiently extract energy from water flows without the resort to dams, opens up a new horizon for exploiting such huge energy resources in the U.S. as tidal and open ocean currents, rivers and canals. The following is a summary of the potential for this technology.
Potential Sites for Tidal Power Installations
| A. |
East Coast
|
|
In this section we will consider several sites along the New England coastline that have conditions which are favorable for the construction of tidal power plants employing GHT technology. The main criteria for the selection of a prospective site is the presence of relatively large water flow through narrow channels leading into a substantial tidal basin. It is important for the mean tides to be high in order to develop the strong currents needed for efficient production of power from GHTs.
The following table identifies some New England sites that are suitable for construction of tidal power plants utilizing GHTs.
|
Site
|
Mean Tide,
m.
|
Water area, sq. km.
|
Annual potential
energy, GW-h
|
Projected power
output, MW
|
|
Passamaquoddy
Tribe
|
5.5
|
2.2
|
131
|
10, (might be
much larger)
|
|
Treat Island
|
5.5
|
100
|
5840
|
360
|
|
Machias Bay
|
3.7
|
65
|
1730
|
180
|
|
Englishman Bay
|
3.7
|
750
|
750
|
80
|
|
Pleasant Bay
|
3.4
|
10
|
228
|
30
|
|
Gouldsboro Bay
|
3.3
|
25
|
520
|
60
|
|
Frenchman Bay
|
3.3
|
150
|
3220
|
400
|
|
Long Cove
|
2.7
|
25
|
350
|
60
|
|
Casco Bay
|
2.7
|
16
|
230
|
40
|
The Passamaquoddy Tribe location is one of the most studied in terms of the exploitation of tidal power, because it has a fairly large basin with a narrow and shallow entrance protected from open ocean storms. Mean tides of 5.5. meters, with maximums of almost 8 meters, provide very high energy density that should permit the production of power at very competitive costs. The unique conditions of Half Moon Cove have made this basin extremely attractive for tidal power development. Indeed, there have been numerous technical and economic feasibility studies on tidal power projects for this region which date back to 1919.
|
|
The following investigations have been conducted in the past:
|
|
-
|
In 1919 Dexter P. Cooper initiated a large-scale international project for the Cobscook Bay site.-In 1930-34, the Army Corps of Engineers constructed a housing development and causeway.
|
|
-
|
In 1977 Stone and Webster Corporation prepared a tidal power study report to the U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration (ERDA)
|
|
-
|
In 1978-82 the Corps conducted a study for the All-American Tidal Projects.
|
|
-
|
In 1976 the Half Moon Tidal Project, initiated by the Passamaquoddy Tribe, proposed to install a small scale tidal power plant of 5 to 12 MW by 1985.
|
|
-
|
In spite of the fact that a great deal of time and money have been spent on exploring the potential production of power from this area, there have been no worthwhile results. Each new effort to design a workable tidal project in this area has been terminated as a consequence of the huge capital investments which would be required for construction of a conventional hydropower system employing a massive ocean dam.
With the development of the GHT technology, which eliminates the need for dams for extracting power from tidal currents, the major obstacles to developing power from these tidal currents have disappeared. One or more tidal power plants using Gorlov Helical Turbines can now be justified economically for the locations identified above, especially for the Cobscook Bay area.
There are many other bays and river estuaries along the East coast that appear suitable for tidal power development using the GHT technology. Unfortunately, there is not sufficient tidal data on power production potential at these sites because the mean tides there are less than 5 meters, which is commonly recommended as the minimum tidal fluctuation for the conventional dam scheme. As a consequence of its beneficial characteristics, however, the critical criteria for power production using GHTs is the water velocity and not the height of the tide. From this point of view, most of the East Coast tidal currents are sufficient for power production using GHTs.
|
| B. |
West Coast
|
|
The tidal sites with the most energy production potential are located in the area of Cook Inlet, Alaska. As the result of the funnel shape of the water basin, the tidal fluctuations in the Cook Inlet are some of the largest in the world. The maximum tidal fluctuation near Anchorage is about 11 meters. The mean diurnal range varies from about 4 meters at the inlet to 9 meters at Anchorage. These conditions indicate the potential for construction in this region of tidal power plants with combined capacities of several hundred megawatts. The Knik Arm and Turnagain Arm basins appear to offer the most suitable locations in the inlet for initial development of tidal power stations.
|
| C. |
Cape Cod and the Islands
|
|
The very first testing of Gorlov Helical Turbines was performed in the tidal currents of the Cape Cod Canal in Massachusetts from June through August of 1996. The water current in the Cape Cod Canal is a typical tidal current characterized by reversing flow four times a day. The canal also has a substantial amount of floating seaweed. The maximum water velocity at the test site was measured at 5.6 ft/s. During the testing, the four different Helical Turbines tested never failed to rotate and generate power. The maximum efficiency of the GHTs tested was about 35% in a water current with a velocity of 5 ft/s. Based on these tests, one could conclude that tidal power stations from 40 kilowatts up to a few megawatts could be constructed in the Cape Cod Canal.
Another prospective site in this region for the installation of a power station using GHTs is in the ocean currents south of Cape Cod, between Woods Hole and Marthas Vineyard. Water current velocities there are in the range of 4 to 5 knots, which is sufficient for the design of a GHT driven power station with a capacity of about 10 megawatts.
|
| D. |
Open Ocean Currents
|
|
The kinetic energy of ocean streams is enormous. The mass of water carried by the Gulf Stream in the Atlantic Ocean is many times greater than the water flow of all the Earths rivers combined. The energy potential of the Gulf Stream at this location is greater than any imaginable requirements for America. The conceptual design for a large-scale floating power farm in the Gulf Stream using GHTs is described by the author in the article Helical Turbines for the Gulf Stream [8]. Employing the approach described in this article, a moored modular power farm with 320 standard twin GHTs could harness about 210 megawatts from an ocean area of only 0.16 square km. Construction costs for such a marine power farm is estimated to be about $300 million, with an installed cost of about $1430 per kilowatt. This estimation was made using GCK Technologys new experimental industrial size twin GHTs, which are 2.5 meters tall and 1.0 meter in diameter. Once installed, the power farm could be expanded as needed in the future, since the potential of the Gulf Stream is practically unlimited. For example, one square mile of ocean surface in the Gulf Stream could generate about 5,500 megawatts using the described design.
Additionally, if the power generated from such a power farm were used for in-situ production of hydrogen fuel by electrolysis of sea water, it would be sufficient to supply hydrogen fuel for all of the automobiles in the U.S., if all the cars were equipped with electric motors using hydrogen fuel cells.
|
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
|
| 1. |
The following sites are recommended for development, at first:
|
|
Passamaquoddy
Treat Island
Other sites of the Cobscook Bay region in Maine
Cape Cod Canal
Ocean currents in the Cape Cod and Marthas Vineyard region
Phases of development
Investigation and selection of the site
Design, construction and monitoring of a 30-50 kW pilot project
Development of the full scale project
The Gulf Stream moored GHT power farm
Site selection near Miami and Key West Island
Development and testing of a 30-50 kW modular pilot project
Phase I: Construction of a 210 MW commercial GHT moored power station
Phase II: Extension of the power station
Phase III: Farther extension of the power station
Selection of sites where both water and wind power systems can be installed complementing and reinforcing each other.
|
|
References:
|
| 1. |
W. W. Wayne, Jr., Tidal Power Possibilities in the United States, ASCE, 1978
|
| 2. |
Reassessment of Fundy Tidal Power. Report of the Fundy Tidal Power Review Board,1977
|
| 3. |
A. M. Gorlov, Novel Approach to Exploitation of Tidal Energy, Report to the DOE, 1981
|
| 4. |
A. M. Gorlov, Hydrogen as an Activating Fuel, Hydrogen Energy, Vol.6, 1983
|
| 5. |
N. Faberge, Passamaquoddy Tribe Tidal Project, Report , 1976 |
| 6. |
A. M. Gorlov, Helical Turbines for the Gulf Stream, Marine Technology, 1998
|
| 7. |
A. M. Gorlov, Testing of Helical Turbines in the Cape Cod Canal, MASS. Technical Report, Northeastern University, Boston, 1996
|
|
|
|